Control of Variables Strategy Inventory (CVSI)

The ability to design controlled experiments and interpret experimental outcomes is a core scientific reasoning skill and a prominent object of science curricula and standards. Hence, appropriate assessment instruments are needed in order to 1) measure this core scientific reasoning skill and 2) evaluate the impact of specific science instruction on the development of those skills. In the literature skills related to controlling variables have often been referred to as “isolation of variables” (Inhelder & Piaget, 1958), “vary-one-thing-at-a-time” [VOTAT] (Tschirgi, 1980) or “control of variables strategy” [CVS]” (Chen & Klahr, 1999). We created a new test instrument that measures multipel sub-skills of the boader CVS construct. The control of variables strategy inventory (CVSI) was tested with more then 1400 students from 5th to 13th grade. The instrument is aviable in Englisch and German.

 

Please refer to the instrument as:

Schwichow, M., Christoph, S., Boone, W., & Haertig, H. (2016). The impact of sub-skills and item content on students’ skills with regard to the control-of-variables strategy. International Journal of Science Education (IJSE). 38 (2). p.216-237.


Download
German version of the CVSI
CVSI_german.pdf
Adobe Acrobat Dokument 2.9 MB
Download
English version of the CVSI
CVSI_english.pdf
Adobe Acrobat Dokument 2.5 MB
Download
Chinese Version of the CVSI 变量控制策略测试
变量控制策略测试
CVSI_chinese.pdf
Adobe Acrobat Dokument 2.2 MB


Test instruments matter

The results of our meta-analysis on CVS intervention studies and an older meat-analysis (Ross, 1988) show consistently that the test instrument influence the results of intervention studies. This finding is not just a mythological interesting fact. It scrutinizes everything we know about scientific reasoning as it doubts the validity of test instruments. Also there has been a lot of research on scientific reasoning and particular on controlling variables the validety of instruments utilized in this studies are not well investigated as a review by Opitz and colleagues shows. Further research should take validity of instruments more seriously.